|
Exchange Rate
The Canadian dollar is a freely floating currency which has experienced
some volatility over the past year. After trading around 65 US cents
in the last quarter of 1998, the Canadian dollar strengthened with
the increase in world commodity prices, peaking near 69.7 US cents
in late January 2000 before losing ground to trade at about 67 US
cents in late May 2000. The average rate for 1999 was 67.3 US cents.
Since May 1999, Canadian market interest rates have risen along
with those in the United States, with the average Canadian short-term
interest rate stabilizing at 4.94 percent (90 day commercial paper)
for 1999. More recently, though, on May 16, 2000 the U.S. Federal
Reserve raised the target for the Federal Funds Rate from 6.0 percent
to 6.5 percent, its sixth round of monetary tightening since mid-June
1999. These moves were aimed at staving off inflationary pressures
that might arise from a tight U.S. labour market, continued strong
U.S. domestic demand and firming foreign economies. Consequently
the Bank of Canada matched these recent interest rate increases
by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Fiscal Policy
Canadian fiscal policy is reflected in the annual federal budget.
In the February 2000 Budget, the central themes included the maintenance
of sound financial management, lowering of taxes, investments, skills
and knowledge provision, and building of an innovative economy.
The government is committed to having either balanced budgets or
surpluses in the years 1999 每 2000, 2000 每 01 and 2001 每 02. This
would be the first time in the last fifty years that the budget
has been balanced or in surplus for at least five consecutive years.
By accounting standards used in most other countries, the Government
of Canada will post a financial surplus for the fourth consecutive
year in 1999 每 2000, the only Group of Seven (G-7) country to do
so.
The further reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio, estimated to be
about 61 percent in 1999 每 2000, remains a key objective of the
government*s fiscal policy. Continued application of unused contingency
reserve funds against the public debt will ensure that the debt-to-GDP
ratio continues to decline to about 55 percent by 2001 每 02 and
to under 50 percent by 2004 每 05.
The fiscal position of provincial-territorial governments is expected
to improve for the seventh consecutive year in 1999 每 2000, resulting
in their combined deficit falling to its lowest level in more than
20 years. Based on current plans and the commitment of all provinces
and territories to having balanced budgets in the medium-term, the
total provincial-territorial deficit should continue to decline.
Monetary Policy
Since 1991, the Federal Government and Bank of Canada have jointly
announced an official target range for the inflation rate. This
target range has been gradually lowered since it was first announced
and currently stands at 1 percent to 3 percent. In February 1998,
the commitment to maintain inflation within the 1 percent to 3 percent
target range was renewed until December 2001. The appropriate long-run
target for monetary policy will be determined by the end of 2001.
In 1998, plunging commodity prices and the Asian crisis, compounded
by the possibility of a Russian default and related capital flows,
caused a substantial decline 每 a record low 每 in the Canadian dollar.
As a consequence, the Bank of Canada increased the Bank Rate a full
percentage point (to 6.0 percent) on 27 August 1998. However, since
the underlying strength of the Canadian economy resulted in its
quick recovery from these shocks, the Bank of Canada subsequently
made a series of interest rate cuts over the September 1998 to August
1999 period, more than reversing the 100 basis points increase of
August 1998.
On 17 May 2000, the Bank of Canada raised its target for the overnight
rate by one-half of one percentage point to 53/4 percent (following
earlier increases in November 1999, and February and March 2000).
The Canadian bank rate is now 6 percent. In its latest Monetary
Policy Report, the Bank of Canada took note of the strength of demand
in Canada from both international and domestic sources, some early
signs of pressures on capacity limits, and the need to lean against
these trends in order to preserve the low and stable inflation environment
that has been benefiting the Canadian economy.
An important source of this strong growth in demand has been the
U.S. economy. The May 16, 2000 action by the U.S. Federal Reserve
to raise its target level for the federal funds rate by 50 basis
points underscores the strength of the U.S. economy and the continued
risk of demand and inflation pressures spilling over from the United
States into Canada.
The move by the Bank of Canada in May 2000 therefore reflects the
judgment that a tightening in monetary conditions in Canada is warranted,
given that the underlying momentum of demand growth and the high
levels of activity risk putting excessive pressure on the economy*s
capacity limits, and thus on inflation. The Bank is of the view
that the commitment to a low and stable inflation environment enables
policy to best contribute to a sustained economic expansion in Canada,
thereby leading to the likelihood of lower unemployment and improved
productivity.
Medium-term Outlook
On the whole, Canada*s near-term economic prospects remain solid.
Anticipating a slowdown in the U.S. economy and somewhat higher
interest rates, private Canadian forecasters are predicting real
GDP growth to be in the 4 percent range in 2000 and to remain healthy
in 2001. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
and International Monetary Fund project that Canada will have the
second fastest economic growth among the Group of Seven major industrial
countries in 2000. This will lead to a lot of job creation.
A strong world economy and the resulting support for commodity
prices 每 combined with firm domestic demand, continued low and stable
inflation and sound public finances 每 should, help offset much of
any negative impact from a U.S. slowdown. Inflation pressures are
widely expected to remain contained over the next two years, reflecting
the success of the inflation control targets and indications that
Canada*s capacity to sustain non-inflationary growth has increased
as a result of structural reforms, the restoration of sound public
finances and technological developments.
CANADA: OVERALL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
| |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
|
GDP
and Major Components (%
change, year over year, except as noted)
|
| |
578 |
562 |
562 |
588 |
611 |
634 |
608 |
645 |
| Real GDP |
0.91 |
2.3 |
4.73 |
2.77 |
1.54 |
4.37 |
3.31 |
4.54 |
| Total Consumption |
1.55 |
1.31 |
1.88 |
1.4 |
1.44 |
2.89 |
2.62 |
2.92 |
| Private Consumption |
1.76 |
1.82 |
3.14 |
2.14 |
2.49 |
4.39 |
2.95 |
3.46 |
| Government Consumption |
1.03 |
0.06 |
-1.24 |
-0.53 |
-1.37 |
-1.25 |
1.65 |
1.32 |
| Total Investment |
-1.47 |
-2.67 |
7.38 |
-1.87 |
5.84 |
15.38 |
3.43 |
10.1 |
| Private Investment |
-1.67 |
-2.78 |
7.38 |
-1.68 |
7.39 |
18.16 |
3.7 |
9.37 |
| Government Investment |
-0.33 |
-2.00 |
7.38 |
-2.92 |
-3.12 |
-2.39 |
1.38 |
15.89 |
| Exports of Goods and Services |
7.88 |
10.94 |
13.11 |
9.04 |
5.91 |
8.78 |
8.86 |
10.02 |
| Imports of Goods and Services |
6.22 |
7.37 |
8.29 |
6.21 |
5.85 |
15.06 |
6.09 |
9.4 |
|
Fiscal
and External Balances
(% of GDP)
|
| Budget Balance (1),(2) |
-9.1 |
-8.7 |
-6.7 |
-5.4 |
-2.8 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.1 |
| Merchandise Trade Balance |
1.3 |
1.8 |
2.6 |
4.4 |
5.1 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
3.5 |
| Current Account Balance |
-3.6 |
-3.9 |
-2.3 |
-0.8 |
0.6 |
-1.6 |
-1.8 |
-0.4 |
| Capital Account Balance |
1.23 |
1.5 |
1.37 |
0.88 |
1.02 |
0.92 |
0.59 |
0.58 |
|
Economic
Indicators (% change year over year earlier period,
except as noted)
|
| GDP Deflator (% change) |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
1.6 |
1 |
-0.6 |
1.6 |
| CPI (% change) 1994=100 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
0.2 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1 |
1.7 |
| M2 (% change) |
3.6 |
2.9 |
2 |
4.1 |
3.02 |
-0.26 |
-0.15 |
2.77 |
| Short-term Interest Rate (%) (3) |
6.74 |
4.97 |
5.66 |
7.22 |
4.35 |
3.61 |
5.05 |
4.94 |
| Exchange Rate (P/US$) |
1.209 |
1.29 |
1.366 |
1.372 |
1.364 |
1.385 |
1.484 |
1.486 |
| Unemployment Rate (%) |
11.2 |
11.4 |
10.3 |
9.4 |
9.6 |
9.1 |
8.3 |
7.6 |
| Population (millions) |
28.38 |
28.7 |
29.04 |
29.35 |
29.67 |
29.99 |
30.25 |
30.49 |
|