|
Deregulation of the Services Sector
The recent regional economic turmoil has altered the backdrop for
economic growth and cost competitiveness. Singapore needs to undertake
appropriate reforms and strategies to remain competitive. One area
in which Singapore is still a laggard is the deregulation of services.
Compared to the manufacturing sector, the services sector is still
very much closed and inefficient. However, the Internet is accelerating
the tradability of services, and as a result, the services sector
in every country will increasingly be subject to global rather than
domestic or regional competition. In addition, given the blurring
boundary between goods and services, an efficient and competitive
services sector will be a vital factor contributing to the vibrancy
of the manufacturing sector. The government therefore stepped up
the deregulation of the services sector ¨C in financial services,
telecommunications, electricity and gas.
In May 1999, the MAS further unveiled its banking sector liberalization
package, which included measures to allow new entrants into the
banking industry, improve corporate governance, remove the foreign
shareholding limit, and allow for more regulatory flexibility concerning
the operations of local banks. The aim is to move towards a more
open and competitive environment, so as to spur the development
and upgrading of local banks, and develop a more dynamic financial
sector.
In February 2000, the Info-Communications Development Authority
(IDA) brought forward the introduction of full market competition
in the telecommunications sector by two years, starting April 2000.
Direct and indirect foreign equity limits for all public telecommunications
services licences were also lifted. An earlier liberalization of
the telecommunications sector would attract major players and help
develop a strong and vibrant info-communications industry, which
depends on globally competitive telecommunication rates and services.
As power is a key component of business costs, Singapore has to
be globally competitive in this sector. Within the next two years,
the contestable parts of the electricity sector will be opened up
fully and competition will be introduced in the natural gas industry.
Committee on Singapore¡¯s Competitiveness
The Committee on Singapore¡¯s Competitiveness (CSC)¡¯s vision is
for Singapore to become an advanced, globally competitive, knowledge
economy over the next decade, with manufacturing and services as
the twin engines of growth.
Manufacturing will remain an integral component in the Singapore
economy, but developing capabilities in the whole manufacturing
value chain beyond production, from R&D and design to marketing
and sales will also be needed. At the same time, Singapore will
develop into a premier services hub in Asia with a global orientation,
with strong competencies in both our traditional hub services as
well as new, high growth services. The domestic sector will be competitive
and vibrant, capable of producing world-class companies and internationally
competitive industries. The workforce will be cost-competitive with
world-class capabilities in business management, technology, innovation,
production and services, and international market development.
Singapore will become a knowledge-based economy where the basis
for competitiveness will be the capabilities and intellectual capital
to absorb process and apply knowledge and to move quickly. Singapore
will be an open cosmopolitan society, attractive to global talent
and connected with other global nodes. Together with the global
talent, a critical mass of risk-taking entrepreneurs, innovators
and arbitrageurs will move the economy ahead in the Information
Age.
Eight Key Strategies Are Recommended To Support Singapore¡¯s
Competitiveness Strategies
- Manufacturing and services as twin engines
To lessen dependence on any single sector or market, thereby reducing
vulnerability and providing a broader and more resilient economic
base.
- Strengthening the external wing
To add a complementary source of growth to the domestic economy
to help overcome our domestic resource, market and talent constraints.
- Developing world-class companies
To increase the depth of corporate profile and broaden the economic
base for more sustained and resilient growth.
- Strengthening the base of local enterprises
To realize their maximum potential and to entrench their relevance
as important strategic partners to MNCs and GLCs in the long run.
- Human and intellectual capital as a key competitive force
To develop a world-class workforce, comprising domestic and foreign
talent, which is motivated, cost-competitive and with outstanding
capabilities.
- Leveraging on science, technology and innovation as competitive
tools
To upgrade existing industry and business clusters and to build
core capabilities to position Singapore as a global IT hub in
the Asia Pacific.
- Optimizing resource management
To continually optimize the allocation of scarce resources to
support the needs of various industries.
- Government as business facilitator
To play an active role to support and facilitate the private sector
through provision of sound, consistent economic policies and a
regulatory environment that is conducive to the conduct of business.
SINGAPORE: OVERALL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
| |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
| GDP and Major Components (% change,
year over year, except as noted) |
| Nominal GDP (million US$) |
49,085 |
57,620 |
69,842 |
83,388 |
91,289 |
94,603 |
82,773 |
84,950 |
| Real GDP |
6.5 |
12.7 |
11.4 |
8.0 |
7.5 |
8.4 |
0.4 |
5.4 |
| Total Consumption |
4.8 |
12.4 |
5.8 |
5.3 |
8.8 |
6.4 |
-0.2 |
5.6 |
| Private Consumption |
5.8 |
11.9 |
7.5 |
4.0 |
6.5 |
6.2 |
-2.1 |
6.2 |
| Government Consumption |
0.4 |
14.7 |
-1.7 |
11.7 |
19.3 |
7.1 |
7.7 |
3.3 |
| Total Investment |
11.8 |
10.3 |
9.6 |
11.8 |
22.8 |
10.6 |
-6.7 |
-3.6 |
| Exports of Goods and Services |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
| Imports of Goods and Services |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
| Fiscal and External Balances (% of
GDP) |
| Budget Balance |
4.9 |
5.9 |
7.6 |
6.2 |
6.1 |
1.1 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
| Merchandise Trade Balance |
-3.7 |
-4.7 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
17.9 |
13.3 |
| Current Account Balance |
12.0 |
7.3 |
16.3 |
17.3 |
15.2 |
17.9 |
25.4 |
25.3 |
| Capital and Financial Account Balance |
3.6 |
-2.2 |
-12.8 |
-5.8 |
-5.8 |
-14.2 |
-26.0 |
-20.7 |
| Capital Account Balance |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
-0.3 |
-0.2 |
| Financial Account Balance |
3.7 |
-2.1 |
-12.7 |
-5.7 |
-5.7 |
-14.0 |
-25.7 |
-20.4 |
| Economic Indicators (% change year
over year earlier period, except as noted) |
| GDP Deflator |
1.5 |
3.3 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
-1.8 |
-1.3 |
| CPI |
2.3 |
2.3 |
3.1 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
-0.3 |
0 |
| M2 |
8.9 |
8.5 |
14.4 |
8.5 |
9.8 |
10.3 |
30.2 |
8.5 |
| Short-term Interest Rate (percent) |
2.46 |
2.26 |
3.62 |
3.41 |
3.41 |
4.10 |
1.72 |
1.68 |
| Exchange Rate (S$/US$) |
1.63 |
1.62 |
1.53 |
1.42 |
1.41 |
1.48 |
1.67 |
1.69 |
| Unemployment Rate (percent) |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
| Population (millions) |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
|